Popular Posts

Showing posts with label Britain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Britain. Show all posts

Week in Review: Catherine Middleton, 20-26 February

The week's not over  yet, but we have things to discuss. So without further ado, here's what Kate wore from 20-26 February (and I shall add on if necessary):

  1.  a) Christening an RNLI lifeboat in Anglesey, 24 February, b) the fascinator, c) the SHOOTIES, and d) the coat from its 2006 appearance at Cheltenham (crafty with the re-cutting, I must say).
  2. The trip back to St. Andrews University, 25 February.
  3. Signing the New Zealand earthquake condolence book, 25 February. A double outfit day already! This is Royal Prep 101: Advanced, I guess.
Best and Worst of the Week
All signs point to me hating outfit 1: I mean, it's all neutrals. And SHOOTIES. But...I kind of dig it. I can't believe I'm saying this about something including that footwear, but this is the best of the week for me. I think I've been swayed by the video from this appearance. I thought she was adorable, and I'm not a born Kate fan. Just chatty and happy to be there, none of that stiff trying-too-hard-to-be-regal thing. Also: HAIR UP! (Out of necessity, but still: victory!)

On the other hand, I should adore outfit 2, for it is RED and the belt/jacket flare is giving her pencil-thin physique some curve. Plus, she's working the timeless angle in a suit that she'll be able to recycle, Princess Anne-styles, for decades to come. But...I'm not feeling it. It's aging her too much? Turtlenecks worn like this terrify me because I can't tell if they're dickeys or not? Am I confusing you as much as I'm confusing myself?

And outfit 3, well, I don't know what she was going to wear to such an occasion (no, I do: I'd have preferred a smart navy suit) but this is alright. Except for the hair. Too much wind in one day = worst of the week.

Oh, friends, I don't know. This week is defying all my Laws of Sartorial Splendor. Do chime in and straighten me out.

Photos: Pacificcoastnews.com/Zimbio/AP/Telegraph/Getty/Daily Mail/Rex/Reuters/Daylife

    Tiara Thursday: The Nizam of Hyderabad Tiara

    Welcome to our new feature, Tiara Thursdays! Created specifically for the indulgence of my inner magpie. (And yours, too!) Every Thursday until Kate and Will's Big Day, I'm highlighting some of the British royal family's tiaras that I'd like to see on Miss Catherine. Pure speculation and crossed fingers, of course. Won't you join in?

    The only downside to being an ardent royal jewel fan: the secrecy. Those royal vaults are sealed so tightly, and no one wants to talk about these explicit markers of majesty - particularly not in these sorts of economic times. So we guess, and we hope that our favorite pieces have survived through the years.

    This one, I'm afraid, might be pure hope.

    On her wedding day, Queen Elizabeth received quite the sparkly avalanche of presents. Among the spoils were a diamond tiara and matching necklace from the Nizam of Hyderabad. Made by Cartier, the design is appropriately based on English roses.
    Excuse me while I quietly sob in the corner and long for the days when wedding gifts could be as over-the-top as the sender wanted, without fear of media hoopla and public backlash. Sigh.
    Okay, I'm back now, and I'm ready to discuss the fate of this diadem.

    (Deep breath.) Queen Elizabeth may have dismantled this tiara. Potentially in favor of assembling this...gem:
    Argh, the Burmese ruby tiara. Honestly, I just don't get her taste in jewels sometimes. Excuse me, I need to get my tissues again.

    These are the facts, or "facts" more accurately, given the absence of official information:
    • The Queen hasn't worn the tiara publicly since about the early 1950s. (The last public appearance including the Nizam tiara that I've seen was 1952.)
    • Of the Burmese ruby tiara's creation, Leslie Field says in The Queen's Jewels: "The diamonds came from a tiara the Queen had been given as a wedding gift by the Nizam of Hyderabad and Berar." (p.69, 1987 ed.) This statement is the main source of the dismantling rumors.
    • However, in Tiaras: A History of Splendour, Geoffrey Munn does not include that detail in his description of the Burmese ruby tiara. He writes only briefly of the Nizam piece, saying: "There is also a tiara in bandeau form that was a wedding gift from the Nizam of Hyderabad," implying by use of the present tense that the piece still exists. (p. 1965, 2003 printing)
    • The Royal Jewels by Suzy Menkes also neglects to mention the dismantling of the tiara, thus implying it still exists.
    • In honor of the 60th wedding anniversary of the Queen and Prince Philip, Buckingham Palace's 2007 summer exhibition included a selection of wedding gifts. On display: the necklace, but not the tiara.  Indeed, no mention of the tiara was made.
    We do know the set hasn't gone away entirely. The Queen still wears the necklace:

    Also, she wears pieces of the tiara: one larger rose brooch and two smaller brooches.

    I say, if the tiara has been dismantled, let's put it back together. Though they may have removed the original diamonds, I'm going to make a leap of faith and assume the frame is still knocking about somewhere. It'd be rude to totally throw a wedding gift away, right? One doesn't want to be rude.
    I think this would be a great choice for Kate. Based on her past tiara-giving behavior, the Queen opts to gift pieces that haven't been seen in a long time (or ever), rather than her favorites. It's got some heft without being overly large and ostentatious, and heaven knows Kate's got the hair to display it right. This one comes with options, which is perfect for a royal that probably won't have a large jewel collection to start out with: the three brooches within the tiara, and the necklace which has a detachable pendant. Also, it's nice and neutral. All diamond and floral, which is easily matched with lots of gowns.

    Your thoughts, dear readers? The Nizam of Hyderabad Tiara for Kate: Yes or No?

    Week in Review: Princess Eugenie, 13-19 February

    Here's what Eugenie wore from 13-19 February:

    1. Out with Sarah and Beatrice, 15 February.
    2. Out with Beatrice, Chelsy Davy and Pippa Middleton, 17 February. Short skirts, all black, lather, rinse, repeat. Snooze.
    Photos: Eroteme.co.uk/Splash News/Daily Mail

    Week in Review: Princess Beatrice, 13-19 February

    Here's what Beatrice wore from 13-19 February:

    1. Out with Sarah and Eugenie, 15 February.
    2. Out with Eugenie, Chelsy Davy and Pippa Middleton, 17 February. I think I might like this little vest thing she's working here. Hmm...
    Photos: O'Rourke/Splashphotos.com/Daily Mail

    Week in Review: Catherine Middleton, 6-12 February

    Here's what Catherine Middleton wore the week of 6-12 February:

    1. Lunching with Camilla, 9 February, a) on Kate and b) from Diane von Furstenberg.
    I've heard a lot of different opinions on this, ranging from "stylish" to "OMGGTGASASAP!" (Translation: OMG get this girl a stylist ASAP! I speak fluent acronym.) Me? I'm just...bored. Criminally boring, that's my verdict: same old makeup, hair worn down again, yet another dress, yet another jacket thrown on top, same old boots. At this point, I just want to see something different. Anything different will do, even if it's total fug. Et toi, my lovelies?

    Photos: Daily Mail/Ikon Pictures

    Week in Review: Princess Beatrice, 30 January - 5 February

    Here's what Princess Beatrice wore the week of 30 January - 5 February:

    1. Leaving a party at the London Louis Vuitton flagship store, 1 February. Action shot! Even princesses have to hail their own cabs. Who knew?
    2. Skiing in Verbier with the family, 5 February. What can you say about a skiing outfit? Looks pretty good for something designed to make you look heavy.
    Photos: Pacificcoastnews.com/Getty Images/Getty Images Europe/Zimbio

    Week in Review: Princess Eugenie, 30 January - 5 February

    Here's what Princess Eugenie wore the week of 30 January - 5 February:

    1. a) and b) Out partying in Verbier, 4 February. Now, this just makes me glad no one's interested in publishing my evening shenanigans in a national newspaper.
    2. Skiing in Verbier, 5 February. With these ski pants, she'll be easily located in case of an avalanche. Smart move, really.
    Photos:  Bauer Griffin/Zimbio/Isabelle Favre/Bancroft Media/Daily Mail

    Flashback Friday: Royal Wardrobe Malfunctions and Mishaps

    I'd like to apologize in advance for the content of this post. Máxima made me do it. Let me tell you something: once you start looking at wardrobe mishaps and malfunctions, you can't stop. It's the train wreck that keeps on giving. Allow me to demonstrate:

    Apart from flashbulb peril, Máxima seems to be prone to earring problems. (Goes with the territory when you wear giant rocks as jewelry, I suppose.) Noticing you lost an earring (left) is not nearly as embarrassing as not noticing (right).

    Left to Right: Crown Princess Mary, Sara Buys (now Sara Parker-Bowles, daughter-in-law of Camilla) at Charles and Camilla's wedding, an engaged Lady Diana Spencer, Princess Michael of Kent
    The unplanned problems are the saddest, really. Even the best laid outfit plans can go astray. Poor Máxima's not alone, Mary's also had some issues with camera flashes and visible undergarments. And who looks at the back of their skirt in a bus-climbing pose before purchase? Another failure to consider camera angles resulted in one of the most famous royal wardrobe malfunctions of all time from poor Diana. At least she didn't do it intentionally...ahem, Princess Michael.

    Princess Eugenie's among the ones I just expect to have some embarrassing moments, what with all those perilously short skirts. She's not the only one to have let the wind get the best of her, though:

    L to R: Queen Elizabeth, Queen Paola, the Duchess of Cornwall, Princess Letizia, the Princess of Wales, Princess Madeleine
    Oh, wind. How dare you mess with the royal composure. You have to give credit to these ladies for rolling on like nothing happened after such unfortunate incidents - some worse than others. (If you recall Letizia's windy moment, you know that I am posting the most delicate photograph I could find. Poor girl.) I had a Marilyn Monroe moment once myself, on a street in London. It still pains me to think of it.

    Extra composure points are awarded for those that have to deal with the wind on the worst possible days. Poor Marie. I'd make a face so much worse than that if nature decided to have its way with my wedding dress. Oh, we'd have words, Nature and I.

    Some royals are more prone to mishaps than others, it seems. Mary's lost her hat on more than one occasion (at Parliament before her wedding, and not so long ago in Vietnam). Lucky for her dashing soldiers always seem to be around to do the hat fetching. Recently, she lost her shoe while in Washington, D.C, proving why a princess shouldn't leave the house without a pedicure. Just in case.

    Here's my question: is Sarah Ferguson truly more prone to wardrobe malfunctions, or do people just take extra delight in her mistakes?
    I know, Sarah. I'm not helping. But I take a stance like Boyfriend Dave there does: what good does a sour face do us? Just have a laugh and move on.

    Finally, my investigation into the phenomenon of  the royal wardrobe malfunction turned up a few particularly disturbing incidences. What do you call it when a mishap is planned, and prepared for, and...intentional?
    L to R: Princess Mabel, Princess Kalina of Bulgaria, Princess Caroline
    Lest anyone be tempted to make excuses for these ladies, let me clarify: this is Mabel attending the King of Norway's birthday celebrations, Kalina attending the silver wedding anniversary in Luxembourg, and Caroline at the Rose Ball. Not a costumed function in sight.

    Listen: if I have to be scarred for life, so do you. We're in this together, friends.

    Week in Review: Princess Beatrice, 16-22 January

    Here's what Princess Beatrice wore the week of 16-22 January:

    1. Leaving Annabel's nightclub, 22 January. Not too shabby - I like this purple Luella jacket better over the black dress than I did when she wore it over a purple dress. That's a bright purple, it needs to stand on its own. And Boyfriend Dave there's looking quite suave, no?
     Photos: Purepeople/Angeli

    Gold Star: Sophie, Countess of Wessex in Reading

    See, here: gray does not have to be so snooze-worthy.
    When I saw the Countess here out and about meeting users of the Readibus service in Reading this week, the first thing I thought was: Sophie's looking good! And really, what more can you ask from an outfit?
    Loving the coat dress: it's basic with just enough added interest from the ruffle trim. And I like the pairing with black stockings; it adds more contrast than nude stockings would have. But most of all, this is just a fantastic shape for her. Forgiving and flattering: a winning combo.

    Sophie turned 46 this week. I'm giving her a gold star for her birthday, because this Countess is looking better in her forties than she ever has before.

    Did you like this one, or is color always better in your world?

    Photos: Indigo/Getty Images

    Flashback Friday: Readers' Best of 2010

    Here we go! Your suggestions for additions to the Best of 2010 list. Ah. This is just what I needed after a week of Worsts and bores and SHOOTIES.

    Princess Mathilde
    I quite like that orange plaid number. My only hesitation comes from the addition of what appears to be orange shoes and orange earrings. A little matching goes a long way, methinks.

    Princess Beatrice
    Excellent leg showings, both. Though I did think that first number was better standing still, rather than in action trudging through the Ascot lawn.

    Princess Letizia
    With the exception of that SHOOTIE appearance (or booties, or whatever you want to call them - it's all fug to me) on the end there, I'm in agreement.

    Crown Princess Mary
    A true abundance of options. The floral Jackie O. inspired look from the Washington, D.C. visit very nearly topped my list too. Divided opinions, though, on the orange gown (and also on that brown jumpsuit...not for me, that).

    Princess Máxima
    That floral Valentino is a lot of dress: not many could pull it off, but she does. Someone mentioned the bicycle riding outfit, which was also worn departing on the train for Margrethe's birthday celebrations, and that got me thinking about this super Hollywood appearance from the train's arrival in Denmark. Chic!

    Crown Princess Victoria
    More excellent choices, particularly the Elie Saab. I don't care for those YSL shoes in the middle, but I think I'm alone on that.

    Many thanks to all that weighed in!

    Top 10 Worst of 2010: The Runners Up

    Narrowing down the field to just 10 of the worst appearances of the year was nearly impossible. You know I love the disastrous appearances. So, without further ado, the ones that almost made it:

    Things that Make Me Sad
    L to R: Princess Máxima, Princess Mathilde, Princess Alexia, Grand Duchess Maria Teresa, Princess Alexandra, Sarah Ferguson
    From bad fabrics (that'd be Máxima and Maria Teresa) to bad shapes (Mathilde and Alexia), these ladies brought me down with their unfortunate selections. Designers make me sad, too: example being when NATAN attacked poor young Princess Alexandra. And when Sarah busted out her Alexander McQueen...it made me weep for the memory of that poor designer. Have some respect for his legacy, Sarah: retire that dress.

    That's enough of the sad. Let's get back to the humorous appearances, shall we?

    When Accessories Attack
    L to R: Princess Elena, Princess Anne, Princess Michael, Queen Margrethe, Princess Claire
    It's the bolero and the hair piece on Elena that takes this pink number from just enthusiastically ball-gownish to straight up costume. Similarly, Princess Anne's outfit on Ascot Day 2 wasn't that bad...until you saw the hair ornaments. It's a little disturbing on a woman of Anne's age (not to mention a woman of Anne's persona). Even more disturbing, though, is this fortune teller get up of Princess Michael. Talk about your costumes! What's not a costume, of course, is Margrethe's floral raincoat - that's just who she is (shame she didn't bust out the matching hat, though). And I'm sadly afraid that these necklaces attacking Princess Claire might just be who she is. Yikes.

    Royal Hippies
    L to R: Princess Cristina, Queen Sofia, Princess Letizia, Charlene Wittstock
    A nice printed fabric, a lovely flow...just makes you yearn for the beach (or Woodstock). But on royal duty? Methinks not. At least we're getting a picture of where Elena might have gotten the inspiration for her clown pants. I have no explanation for Charlene, though. Let's just hope she'll have a better Armani experience come wedding time.

    Prints Gone Wild
    L to R: Crown Princess Margarita, Princess Irene, Queen Beatrix, Princess Märtha Louise (times 2!)
    Oh, prints went wild on the dance floor too this year. Margarita combined the ever-popular jail bird trend with a nice floral for a truly mind-boggling frock, while Princess Irene and Queen Beatrix went paisley (why?). Märtha Louise, always one to give us something to snicker at, dished up two doozies this year: sea creature with a mullet at Victoria's pre-wedding dinner, and striped up like a football star during the Netherlands state visit. It should be noted that she's worn that dress before, to Frederik and Mary's wedding. She appears to only wear it when she has a sash that accentuates the stripe-age.

    A Serious Case of Try Hard
    L to R: Crown Princess Pavlos, Princess Nikolaos, Princess Letizia, Crown Princess Victoria, Crown Princess Mary, Princess Mabel
    There's a lot of fashionable princesses mucking about out there. There are some that are truly stylish, and some that just think they are, but they all have their moments of Trying Too Hard. Marie-Chantal is a couture-clad designer, but I still don't get this overly metallic frock. (Too much.) Tatiana's another fashion industry veteran, but this black outfit crosses from fashionable to Halloween. (Too harsh.) Letizia tries, but I will never have any love for the M.C. Hammer pants. (Too wrong.) I love Victoria, but shooties? Seriously? (Too much of a travesty.) And Mary, she gets it right so often, but this top and these pants and those shoes on a pregnant lady...no. (Too much try.)

    Naturally, we close once again with Mabel. With stripper shoes...and a jumpsuit. Wait, why didn't this one make the countdown? Crap.

    Alright, you've heard me out. Now, tell me: who did I miss?

    Flashback Friday: Leaving the Hospital in Style

    Mary's leaving the hospital with her twins today! Yay. Even snarky old me has to love a snugly little baby (times 2!).

    What a tricky appearance, though. I'm not a mother myself, but I can imagine that the absolute last thing you'd want to do so soon after birth is present yourself before the world's media. You're not back to your pre-pregnancy form (not even close, assuming you're human!), you're tired, and sweatpants must be carrying a far greater allure than they ever have before.

    Let's see how past royal mums have handled the situation, shall we?

    I think there are only two pictures in existence of my mother pregnant. Now I know why. If I ever decide to gestate a human of my own, I'll make sure to thank my lucky stars that maternity fashion's come so far in the last few decades.

    Nowadays, the rules of regular fashion still apply to maternity and après-maternity wear: when in doubt, go with a flattering jacket. Seriously, how cute is Mathilde in that red number?

    Here's another useful strategy for new mothers that might not want the spotlight on their fashion or their figure: apply the art of distraction. You've got a cute baby, use it! There's no reason to focus on the mother.
    Here's Mary showcasing the pretty blanket strategy, Claire employing the extra fabric strategy, and Letizia going straightforward by showing off that little munchkin face. I'm far more concerned with trying to figure out how much of Claire's bundle is baby and how much is just fabric than I am with what she's wearing. (Though, for the record, Mary's appearance there with baby Isabella is my fave. No need for distraction there - such a lovely top.)

    If I were a royal mum, though, I think I'd push for another strategy altogether.
    Let the mother sneak quickly out and leave the parading to the new father. Pose for family photos later on, after you've had plenty of pajama relaxing time.

    Who wins your prize for best dressed new mother?

    Photos: Life/Getty Images/Hola

    Top 10 Worst of 2010: #8. Sarah Ferguson at Alice Ferguson's Wedding

    Sarah Ferguson didn't even make that many appearances in 2010, yet there were two serious contenders among them for my little list. Quite a feat, that. Both well done and exceedingly poorly done at the same time.

    There was this one, of course. Oh, Sarah. But this one takes the cake for me:
    Where do I even start? Let's just dig right in: the dress carries a distracting pattern and a distracting neckline, and then she's gone and placed it under a jacket which has it's own serious amount of STUFF going on, and all that goes under a fascinator that has yet more things happening on it. The bag's for evening, the shoes are more for day, and neither is an appropriate match to the whimsy that dress is trying to bring to the ensemble.

    You can not use the art of TOO MUCH to distract from the fact that you can't dress yourself properly for your own age. Attempt it, and you shall find yourself on the Worst list. I'm sorry, but those are the rules.

    Photo: Daily Mail

    Week in Review: Princess Beatrice, 1-8 January

    Here's what Princess Beatrice wore the week of 1-8 January:
    1. Holidaying in the Caribbean.
    2. Attending the wedding of Sarah Stourton and Harry Aubrey-Fletcher, 8 January. She also wore this coat to Christmas. I like the idea but I question the execution of the coat.
    I like the idea of the coat, but I do question the execution. Either she's got a whole extra purse worth of stuff in those pockets, or they're just designed to sag out. Neither situation is desirable, really.

    Updated: Missed this one, leaving a bar on 7 January.

    Photos: EaglePress/BigPicturesPhoto.com/Daily Mai/Belga

    Week in Review: Catherine Middleton, 1-8 January

    Here's what Catherine Middleton wore the week of 1-8 January:
    1. a. Attending the wedding of Sarah Stourton and Harry Aubrey-Fletcher, 8 January; b. the coat from Libelula; c. the dress as worn to the wedding of Peter and Autumn Phillips. I think the dress is Issa?
    Well, now. See, here's the thing: she goes and wears a sheer dress that I have to think more suitable to a New Year's Eve party than to a wedding, and it's black (oh, so much black! Not another one with all the black, please!) - but then she goes and pairs a hot purple shoe with it and now my mouth is shut. Purple shoes are like my Kryptonite. She's crafty, this one.


    Photos: Libuella/Hello

    Top 10 Worst of 2010: #10. Princess Anne at King Constantine's Birthday Party

    Oh, Anne. You so crazy. I get that you're a serial outfit repeater, but I will never get this:
    I'm assuming that this is a repeat from an event deep in the 1980's, even though I haven't seen photographic proof of it. I have to assume that, because I'm not sure my faith in the fashion industry could withstand the revelation that somebody actually made this for her anytime after, say, 1993. And any outfit that makes me question the fashion industry as a whole deserves a spot on the Worst list. Am I right? Examine the back of it before you make your decision:

    Photos: Newspix/Belga

    Best of 2010: Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie

    This week I'm picking out my favorite outfit worn by each of the royals I've covered regularly here on the blog. Join in the fun!

    As I said, some of these royals had a whole lot of choices for their best outfits of the year, and some did not. Beatrice and Eugenie did not. Just a parade of short and shorter skirts, really. Such, I suppose, is the peril of balancing your fun-loving university life with that big ol' title in front of your name. Here's what I loved in 2010:
    Why are these two outfits my favorites of the year? Because I think they were successful mixings of the personal club-going style of these two ladies and occasion-appropriateness. Eugenie's showing at Sandringham for A Very Royal Christmas 2010 was fantastic, I thought: the coat's the right length but it has great style, as does the slightly funky hat. And I loved Beatrice at Royal Ascot - the flapper-esque dress was a fresh take on the traditional dress + jacket combo.

    Honorable Mentions
    Eugenie gets an honorable mention just for wearing a longer skirt - and at a club, even! - while Beatrice's summer holiday dress is fresh, crisp, and flattering.

    Tell me: what were your favorite Beatrice and Eugenie outfits of 2010?
     
    Photos: Belga/MAXPPP

    Gold Star: Prince Harry in Berlin

    I don't talk about royal men's fashion too much on the blog, apart from some incidental admiration and/or doses of eye candy for the lady (and selected gentleman) readers. It's not that interesting, really: suit, tie, repeat. The Danish royal men are prone to the occasional show of sartorial flare...
    But even the best laid plans have a tendency to go astray.

    So I was particularly excited to see these pictures surface of Prince Harry in Berlin.
     Now, this is how it's done.
    Well fit coat atop a sweater atop a shirt and tie in coordinating patterns. I could get used to this.

    Who makes your list of best dressed royal men?

    Photos: PPE/ddp/Langbehn/Bauer Griffin/Zimbio/Getty/Daylife